|
AllBestWeekMonthRandom<Prev1234567..356Next> |
#307687* (?/37) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<HarmoNicks> so-called life lessons in kids shows are retarded
<HarmoNicks> "it's what's on the inside that counts" is bullshit
<HarmoNicks> what you're basically saying there to people who are single
<HarmoNicks> is "not only are you ugly, but your personality is shit as well"
<Rosti> rofl
<Rosti> so you're not a fan of The Ugly Duckling then?
<HarmoNicks> no
<HarmoNicks> that story has no truth to it
<HarmoNicks> if you look ugly as a baby you'll end up being beautiful later?
<HarmoNicks> bullshit
<HarmoNicks> almost all babies are adorable
<HarmoNicks> if you're ugly as a baby
<HarmoNicks> then you've got some sort of genetic defect or something else horribly wrong with you
<HarmoNicks> and that shit ain't going to get prettier with age |
#307686* (?/47) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
testblahblah |
#307685* (?/26) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<devin> i'm dead
<Rena> oh great now the channel is haunted
<Bagel> what's worse is that devin really is a banana despite what he believed
<Bagel> so we're haunted by banana ghost
<Rena> and here I thought someone had just farted after eating a ton of bananas
<Rena> wait, if you did that, would you have radioactive farts
<Rena> ...Mr Rogers was inspired by TV. He saw people throwing pies at eachother and said "such amazing technology and we're using it for *this*!?" He'd have a heart attack if he could see the internet today.Comment: we never did resolve the radioactive farts issue
|
#307684* (?/51) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<Anne> hey. let's cybersex roleplay
<zmoney69> okay
<Anne> i'll be your mom, and you be every guy in town |
#307683* (?/31) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
< pipe> My electronics component store changed its website a few years ago
< pipe> *everyone* hated it
< pipe> It's been a common engineering joke since then
< pipe> Yesterday oslt there was some news on their website: "New improved website! You can now use the back button in your browser to navigate back to the previous page!"Comment: web 2.0
|
|
T-Shirt Hell: Talk Nerdy to Me
|
#307682* (?/39) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<woopdee> Chilean officials said they were hoping to bring the first miner to the surface before midnight.
<TestDummy> But then Java crashed? |
#307681* (?/33) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<WTF> give me a good name, and ill suck your dick. |
#307680* (?/26) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
* Sarig has joined
<Sarig> and he's not even in
<Sarig> so disappointed
<@Z`> he smaller than he claimed eh
<Sarig> I'll admit
<Sarig> didn't plan that one |
#307679* (?/44) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<mophead> ok, now for cats in boots
<ctburley> yesssss
<rahaeli> BOOTS. CATS. BOOTS. CATS.
<ctburley> LEATHER BOOTSLEATHER BOOTSLEATHER BOOTSLEATHER BOOTS
<rahaeli> leather boots leather boots leather BOOTS. CATS. BOOTS. CATS.
<Afuna> heee proctor it is
<Afuna> beeeees
<ctburley> beeeezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
<mo phead> oooh! |
#307678* (?/23) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<A-man> after some physical simulation with luxrender.. pink floyd's album cover is incorrect
<A-man> there is no internal reflections coming out in other places like they should
<A-man> unless theres a perfect angle i havent discovered |
#307677* (?/40) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<andro> makes owls binbag fetish look normal
<Jorfs> it's not funny
<Beans> Oh?
<Jorfs> don't joke about owls binbag fetish
<Beans> I did try to fuck a dead cat, btw. If you'd like to know.
<noontekno> how can someone make tiiim look normal
<noontekno> oh
<Hendricks> ..
<Jorfs> wait binbag fetish?
<noontekno> yeah you make tiiim look like ghandi
<Jorfs> wait, what, dead cat?
<Beans> lol
<andro> ...............................................
<andro> just go away beans
<Jorfs> necrobestiality?!?
<Beans> A ginger tabby I later threw in a river.
<Jorfs> oh jesus christ |
#307676* (?/34) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
Phillip: haha i like the "accidentally the whole thing" joke you put in there
You: thanks
Phillip: you that from me though
You: i didn't that from you
Phillip: you totally that from me
You: no way, i that from the internet
Phillip: i up with accidentally the whole thing
You: you did NOT up with the accidentally the whole thing
Phillip: its true, but the first time i it, i was so hard
Phillip: ... ahem |
#307675* (?/35) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<kokoretsi>downloaded a 1925 film and spent 5 minutes looking for subs. I then realise it's a silent film :| |
#307674* (?/76) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
Please upvote if you think QDB should fix the mangling of Unicode characters in submitted quotes. |
#307673* (?/53) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<cky> "Nothing is better than sex. Masturbation is better than nothing. Therefore, masturbation is better than sex."
<jmkeyes> ohhh logical fallacies
<cky> jmkeyes: Indeed!!
<cky> The fallacy here being that "nothing" is not a single point, but is a massive space.
<cky> And that the two "nothings" above refer to different points in that space.
<KirarinSnow> cky: the fallacy is that 'nothing' is not of the same semantic type as any particular thing
<KirarinSnow> though it appears to be syntactically the same
<KirarinSnow> a particular thing is of type e
<KirarinSnow> 'nothing' is of type <<e, t>, t>
<KirarinSnow> in other words, to evaluate a sentence "the cake is a lie", where "the cake" is an expression of type e denoting an object
<KirarinSnow> and "is a lie" is an expression of type <e, t> (that is, a predicate mapping objects of type e to truth values)
<KirarinSnow> we apply the function denoted by "is a lie", which is λx.[x is a lie]
<KirarinSnow> to the individual denoted by "the cake"
<KirarinSnow> and we get a truth value
<KirarinSnow> with 'nothing', on the other hand, you have the sentence "nothing is a lie"
<KirarinSnow> you can't apply the same function because 'nothing' is not an expression of type e
<KirarinSnow> instead, you apply the function denoted by 'nothing' to the predicate instead
<KirarinSnow> 'nothing' denotes \lambda P. \lambda x.~P(x)
<KirarinSnow> when you apply this lambda to the function denoted by "is a lie"
<KirarinSnow> you get by beta reduction
<KirarinSnow> \forall x.~[(\lambda y.[y is a lie])(x)]
<KirarinSnow> another round of beta reduction gives you
<KirarinSnow> \forall x.~[x is a lie]
<KirarinSnow> this is how quantifiers work in semantics (on the basic level)
<KirarinSnow> linguists love lambdas
<Daeken> wow
<Daeken> it's rare that 30 lines here will go completely over my head. you pulled it off. |
|
The London Vandal Store, you should check it out.
|
#307672* (?/39) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<cky> "Nothing is better than sex. Masturbation is better than nothing. Therefore, masturbation is better than sex."
<jmkeyes> ohhh logical fallacies
<cky> jmkeyes: Indeed!!
<cky> The fallacy here being that "nothing" is not a single point, but is a massive space.
<cky> And that the two "nothings" above refer to different points in that space.
<KirarinSnow> cky: the fallacy is that 'nothing' is not of the same semantic type as any particular thing
<KirarinSnow> though it appears to be syntactically the same
<KirarinSnow> a particular thing is of type e
<KirarinSnow> 'nothing' is of type <<e, t>, t>
<KirarinSnow> in other words, to evaluate a sentence "the cake is a lie", where "the cake" is an expression of type e denoting an object
<KirarinSnow> and "is a lie" is an expression of type <e, t> (that is, a predicate mapping objects of type e to truth values)
<KirarinSnow> we apply the function denoted by "is a lie", which is λx.[x is a lie]
<KirarinSnow> to the individual denoted by "the cake"
<KirarinSnow> and we get a truth value
<KirarinSnow> with 'nothing', on the other hand, you have the sentence "nothing is a lie"
<KirarinSnow> you can't apply the same function because 'nothing' is not an expression of type e
<KirarinSnow> instead, you apply the function denoted by 'nothing' to the predicate instead
<KirarinSnow> 'nothing' denotes λP.∀x.~P(x)
<KirarinSnow> when you apply this lambda to the function denoted by "is a lie"
<KirarinSnow> you get by beta reduction
<KirarinSnow> ∀x.~[(λy.[y is a lie])(x)]
<KirarinSnow> another round of beta reduction gives you
<KirarinSnow> ∀x.~[x is a lie]
<KirarinSnow> this is how quantifiers work in semantics (on the basic level)
<KirarinSnow> linguists love lambdas
<Daeken> wow
<Daeken> it's rare that 30 lines here will go completely over my head. you pulled it off. |
#307671* (?/48) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<yvan> you've gotta get my rank right. I'm not Captain Obvious, I'm General Confusion
<Rubie> I just thought you were generally confused.
<yvan> Yes, that's why I'm General Confusion, Captain Obvious
Report this post Delete post |
#307670* (?/42) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
< Novice> It's not a computer anymore. It's a member of Norton's botnet. |
#307669* (?/44) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<@reimero> I like my women like I like snow:
<@reimero> go.
<@hackess> Blowing sideways
<@hackess> Piled at the curb
<@hackess> Only around for three months.
<@reimero> Outside.
<@Mr_Shifty> stuck to the bottom of my boots
<@Mr_Shifty> ground up in the front of my snowblower?
<@Mr_Shifty> flavored with raspberry syrup
<@reimero> Down my pants?
<@Mr_Shifty> falling out of the sky
<@hackess> Formed into balls and thrown at my friends.
<@reimero> Frequently found in Canada
<@Mr_Shifty> thoroughly salted
<@Mr_Shifty> on my windshield
<@hackess> Better with hot chocolate
<@reimero> Surrounding frozen ponds
<@hackess> Serving as a portend of hockey season?
<@Mr_Shifty> With my name written in it?
<@reimero> Keeping me home from work!
<@Mr_Shifty> creating hazardous driving conditions |
#307668* (?/41) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<@Mr_Shifty> I like my women like I like my gravy.
<@reimero> On my meat |
#307667* (?/50) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<@Novice> Hi! Welcome to the airport. Radiation or rape? |
#307666* (?/48) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<Achelea> "Dear Dracula, Remember that night a few years ago? Well, you have a son, his name is Edward. Sincerly, Tinkerbell |
#307665* (?/39) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<Mister_Rose> My Spanish teacher is awesome.
<Mister_Rose> We were doing that thing where you have four words, and you have to pick the one that doesn't fit with the rest.
<Mister_Rose> And he's like, "In Spanish, we say 'no va'."
<Mister_Rose> He wanted to explain it in English though for those who hadn't done this before.
<Mister_Rose> So he sits and thinks for a second.
<Mister_Rose> Then writes on the board:
<Mister_Rose> cat hair door knob Sarah Palin a rock
<Mister_Rose> "Now, Sarah Palin does not fit, as the other three have more thinking ability." |
#307664* (?/28) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<Crescens2k> well, there are some h-manga artists who think you can fit arms, legs and penises the size of your arm in there without any problem, so why not a horses head |
#307663* (?/30) ↑Keep It ↓Trash It πOld
<EddieGordo> this is what i get for using yeast with a space shuttle on the package
<EddieGordo> 20% alcohol in 7 days...
<~Kentaree> lol
<EddieGordo> more like 7 hours at this rate
<~Kentaree> you're going for a 20% abv whiskey? :_/
<EddieGordo> no
<EddieGordo> thats as high as you can ferment naturally
<EddieGordo> then you have to distill
<~Kentaree> ah
<EddieGordo> which i have found a legal method by which to turn my 2liters of 20% single malt
<EddieGordo> into a 40% single malt whisky
<EddieGordo> assuming i have any wort left when its done
<EddieGordo> its like the yeast is running off with my booze
<~Kentaree> lol
<~Kentaree> well, yeast IS Alive
<EddieGordo> i know
<~Kentaree> maybe it was thirsty
<EddieGordo> its drinking its own piss then
<EddieGordo> shit
<EddieGordo> my yeast is bear grylls
<~Kentaree> lmao |
|
Subscribe to the RSS feed to get the latest approved quotes
|
|
save page |
share: reddit
stumbleupon
digg
facebook
twitter
tumblr
<Prev1234567..356Next> |
|